Sunday, March 16, 2008

2008-2009 SCHOOL SITE PLAN...PLEASE NOTE MONITORING OF ALL GOALS SHOUL READ AS AGREED""THE ADMINISTRATION, UBC, AND SSC....."

SAN FRANCISCO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

Academic Plan
for
Student Achievement
(2008-2009 School Year)

Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Academic Middle School
School


38684786059885
CDS Code

Draft #3, March 4, 2008
Date of this plan/revision
Purpose of this Academic Plan

This academic plan meets the content requirements of amended Education
Code Section 64001 (effective January 2002) for a single school plan
for pupil achievement. Such a plan must be developed at each school
that operates any programs funded through the Consolidated Application.

This academic plan provides a single, comprehensive school plan to
improve the academic performance of students. Its use requires
collection and analysis of student performance data, setting priorities
for program improvements, rigorous use of effective solution
strategies, and ongoing monitoring of results. The template provides a
structured means to improve teaching and learning to meet state content
and performance standards. To accomplish this purpose, the template
includes elements found by educational research and professional
practice to be essential to the success of plans to improve student
academic performance. In addition, if all applicable portions of the
template are properly completed, school plan content requirements will
be met for all programs for which the school has an allocation in the
Consolidated Application.

Schools operating School-Based Coordinated Programs must include
instructional and auxiliary services to meet the special needs of
English learners, educationally disadvantaged pupils, gifted and
talented pupils, and pupils with exceptional needs.

DATA SUMMARY
(To be provided by Research, Planning and Accountability, format TBD)

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


Analysis of Current Educational Practice
The following questions will help you reflect on current educational
practices at your school and its impact on improving student
achievement, and to craft your academic plan for the 2007-2008 school
year:


Currently, what are the two or three (2-3) key objectives for the
school in 2006-2007 (across the five District goals)? For each
objective, please briefly answer the following questions, if
applicable:
What key strategies and high-leverage activities are being implemented
in order to achieve those objectives?
What challenges or barriers (within the school) is the school facing
and how is the school trying to overcome them?
How are resources (WSF and categorical funds) being aligned school-wide
to achieve those objectives, especially services and supports to enable
under-performing students to meet standards?
What and how are additional family, school, district and community
resources used to assist these students and what impacts have been
observed?

Current-Year Objective 1: "By June, 2007, all significant groups
(African American, Latino, students with disabilities) will meet the
minimum percentile 'at or above proficient' in both English/Language
Arts and Mathematics, as reflected in the CDE AYP Report published in
late August, 2007."
1.In order to motivate and hence raise the reading levels of our
students, a full time librarian was hired the first week in December.
She quickly surveyed students and staff to assess priorities in
"re-inventing" the school library. Since then, $15,000 has been spent
to purchase new computers, furniture and book displays, books and
magazines. She has given tours to all E/LA, math, social studies
classes; created book clubs; and taught basic research skill seminars
to classes. 2. In our second year involvement in MSTLI, we have
continued administering benchmark assessments in E/LA and math and
analyzed assessment results to re-teach standards. 3. A focal list of
African American and ELL students have been published and distributed
to all teachers (Basic scoring students). Discussions have begun at
grade levels to determine strategies to move them to state "Proficient"
subject matter levels.
Ten certificated faculty members are new to our school, of which seven
are probationary in status. This poses a tremendous challenge to coach,
evaluate, and create a professional culture of competent teachers.
Also, to our students, who must learn new adult personalities and meet
their as yet untried expectations.
In mid-September, we re-evaluated our budget and determined that rather
than hire a literacy specialist we would opt for a librarian. Our
school has not had a librarian for five years.
1. Through our California GEAR UP (Gaining Early Awareness and
Readiness in Undergraduate Programs), we have begun to raise a culture
of college bound students among our student body. Ten focal students
submitted applications and essays for review of the $2,000 trust
scholarship giveaways. This is a motivating factor to excel in school.
2. Grade level counselors and administrators have initiated meetings
with parents and students of focal students in an effort to reiterate
the expectation that these students will score "Proficient" on their
spring, 2007 STAR exam.


Current-Year Objective 2: "A compared with 2005-2006, 5% more students,
including English Learners, will be placed in the Benchmark category,
having moved up from Strategic or Intervention status. This will then
mean a 5% increase in the number of students eligible to take an
elective class. This will result from a comparable increase in STAR
test results, scores on SFUSD Benchmark Assessments, and CELDT scores."
1. Shortly before the conclusion of the first semester, we reviewed
students' benchmark results in math and E/LA to see if students moved
up or down from elective/strategic/intervention. We concluded that up
to twenty students were eligible to move up to electives, and that 17
students would be placed in strategic from elective classes because of
their benchmark results. Hence, student moves were made to match their
performance indicators and academic status.
1. The greatest challenges to successfully implementing this objective
are (a) inconsistencies in student's approach to standardized testing,
and (b) new teachers to the career and MLK Middle School who are not
familiar with benchmark assessments nor why they are invaluable tools;
c) teachers not familiar with High Point, Prentice Hall materials; and
d) students who do not take these periodic assessments seriously.
1. Funds are used to purchase supplementary materials in reading and
E/LA support classes.
1. The After School Program includes tutorial opportunities for
students. Teachers also tutor students during and after school. 2.
District-purchased learning packets, "Practice and Mastery" booklets in
math and English are utilized

Current-Year Objective 3: "At the conclusion of the school year, the
school will have decreased the number of tardy students arriving to
school by 10% and the number of behavior-related referrals by 30%."
1. A Peer Court has been piloted to mete out consequences by students
to students who committed school infractions. This has succeeded in
making more students aware of their investment in our school culture
and facility. 2. The "Tools for Success" program under Noah Salzman,
consultant, has been introduced this school year. Five school wide
student behavior expectations, and procedures to implement once
students have violated these expectations, have been discussed. The
in-house suspension room is now in place, with over sixty student
referrals to that location for violation of classroom and school-wide
behaviors.
1. Faculty has been apprehensive in adopting several procedures of
Salzman's "Tools for Success" because of unfamiliarity and current
practices. 2. Because of ten new certificated staff members, students
are challenging adult limitations on misbehavior. We are experiencing a
two-fold increase, rather than 30% drop in teacher referrals, in
addition to more suspensions than the previous years.
1. We have procured the services of Noah Salzman, consultant, to assist
us in defining discipline behavior and implementing a five step
approach to meting student misbehavior. 2. A part-time Peer Resource
person was funded to work with key students in peer mediation and
conflict resolution.
1. We have procured the services of SFPD "Gang Violence Prevention" to
speak with all 6th grade students over a 6 week period on peer
pressure, bullying.


Priorities for 2007-2008
The School Site Council has analyzed the academic performance of all
student groups and has considered the effectiveness of key elements of
the instructional program for students failing to meet API and AYP
targets. Below are the data conclusions for each of the five District
Goals and the school's key objectives and strategies for the upcoming
2007-2008 school year.


Goal 1: Academic Achievement
Significantly increase academic achievement and learning for all
students, including closing the achievement gap, based on achievement
data. Focus must be on reading and mathematics as measured by tests
and other assessments as appropriate.
Data Conclusions for Goal 1
Questions to cover:
What are the key data findings observed from last year's CST? What
achievement gaps exist (can be grade-level gaps, subject-subject, by
racial subgroups, EL vs. non-EL students, Specia Ed vs. non-Special Ed
students, EDY vs. non-EDY students, etc.). [Note: The overall
performance of English learners, Special Ed, and socio-economically
disadvantaged students should be addressed in Goal 2; however, any
achievement gaps that exist for or within these subgroups should be
addressed here in Goal 1.]
What patterns or trends have been observed over multiple years?
What additional school data was analyzed, if any (i.e. data gathered
from benchmark assessments, pre/post tests administered, surveys,
attendance data, etc.) and what are the key patterns or trends
observed?
Key Findings:
Although all groups made significant gains on the 2006 CSTs, the
achievement gap between the African American, Latino, and Special
Education students and our other students remains as wide as in
previous years. Our English Learners also have lower scores, though
ethnicity seems to be a factor as well—Latino students are experiencing
more difficulty with reading and writing skills than other EL students.
The test score gaps noted above have been seen at MLK for the last five
years. Previous and current efforts to accelerate the test success of
the groups named above have not succeeded, though the scores of these
students have risen in general along with those of the other students.
The results from the 2006-2007 ELA and Math Benchmark Assessments show
that these same groups continue to lag behind our other students,
though the gap is getting smaller for Latino students. Loss of
instructional time due to absences, tardies, and behavioral infractions
is a critical factor for some but not all of the students in these
groups. Variable home support, insufficient academic motivation,
learning difficulties, and staff turnover are also involved. Each
student has a unique mix of these and other factors that must be
addressed in order to close the achievement gap.

Proficiency and Above
General School Gr 6 Gr 7 Gr 8
E/LA 33% 46% 39%
Math 42% 48% 30%

AA Students Gr 6 Gr 7 Gr 8
E/LA 16% 9% 9%
Math 9% 6% 0%

L Students Gr 6 Gr 7 Gr 8
E/LA 26% 29% 28%
Math 21% 22% 21%

EL Students Gr 6 Gr 7 Gr 8
E/LA 12% 7% 11%
Math 27% 32% 8%

Key Objectives for Goal 1
[Based on the data conclusions above, identify the key objectives (one
to three) for Goal 1 for the school.]
Objective 1: CST scores for African American, Latino, and Special
Education students will meet or exceed the CDE's 2007-2008 proficiency
targets and AYP requirements.
Objective 2: Instructional time and academic engagement of African
American, Latino, and RSP/Inclusion students will show significant
improvement over current rates.
Objective 3: The timely delivery and effectiveness of both academic
and affective interventions for these targeted students will also
improve over current levels.

Key Strategies for Goal 1
[What key strategies will be implemented in order to achieve the
objectives above? Please be as specific as possible in describing how
these strategies will lead to improved student achievement.]
Key Strategy 1: Improve and expand the existing student support systems
(including SST and SAP) so as to better address the factors affecting
each non-proficient student's progress. This includes improved
monitoring of student support services, and more effective use of STAR
school personnel and community resources.
Key Strategy 2: Improve the attendance and active class participation
of African American, Latino, ELL, and Special Education through both
external and internal incentives and place more emphasis on engaging
and culturally sensitive and relevant delivery of curricula.
Key Strategy 3: Refine and/or introduce academic and affective
interventions and monitoring/feedback systems to help improve the
academic success of these targeted and focal student groups, including
the use math and E/LA benchmark assessments to redirect instruction,
and implement student engagement instructional classroom strategies.


Goal 2: Academic Equity
Ensure that all students have access to a comprehensive education by
providing a high-quality program of studies in the Core Curriculum
areas (English/language arts, mathematics, science, social studies,
visual and performing arts, health and physical education), world
languages, and school-to-career and technical programs where
appropriate.

Data Conclusions for Goal 2
Questions to cover:
What special programs (Special Education, GATE, Honors, AP, ELD,
language immersion, arts magnet, etc.) are offered at your school?
What are the key data findings observed for students participating in
these programs from last year's CST? [Note: If academic achievement
for students in these programs was disaggregated by racial subgroup and
any achievement gaps were observed, these gaps should be discussed in
Goal 1.]
Are any racial subgroups underrepresented or overrepresented in certain
programs (i.e. low African American students in GATE, Honors, and/or AP
programs, high numbers of EL students in Special Education)?
What patterns or trends have been observed over multiple years?
What additional school data was analyzed (can be data gathered from
benchmark assessments, pre/post tests administered, surveys, attendance
data, etc.) and what are the key patterns or trends observed?
Key Findings:
MLK currently has RSP and SDC programs for special education students
whose learning disabilities range from mild to severe. As much as
feasible, these students are allowed access to general education
classes. GATE students have the same program as other students, but
receive some differentiated instruction and preferential access to
certain elective classes. There are no Honors classes at MLK, based on
our original Consent Decree mandate, but all 8th graders do take
Algebra. English Learners are intermixed with general education
students in classes using ELD and SDAIE instructional strategies. Lower
performing EL students are grouped together for one period of the day
in an intervention reading class.
The special education students continue to score mainly in the Far
Below thru Basic ranges on CSTs. GATE students are scoring comparably
well with GATE students in other SFUSD middle schools. English
Learners show steady progress in learning English, as shown through
CELDT scores and the reclassification rate, and on CST scores, though
more so for Asian than Latino students.
Over the past six years, MLK's English Learner population has grown
notably. This has increased the need for professional development in
ELD and SDAIE strategies. The number of students designated as GATE has
also increased, mostly through student success on standardized tests,
and most of these are Asian students.
Current analysis of SFUSD Benchmark assessments shows that MLK students
are not performing quite as well as last year when compared with other
SFUSD middle schools. A higher than normal degree of staff turnover
from last year, resulting in a higher percentage of relatively
inexperienced teachers this year, is one probable factor. SDC student
access to the core curriculum is currently in process of review and
revision. Most general education students designated as needing
intervention have been placed in supplemental "strategic" ELA classes
rather than High Point classes so as to better support learning of the
core curriculum standards. Intervention classes for English Learners
still use the district-approved intervention curriculum, but are
supplemented with instruction focusing on core standards as well.
Underperforming students have less access to elective classes due to
scheduling and staffing limits. This is compensated, to some extent,
via music and art based assemblies and field trips, and participation
in the After School Program. In particular, a before school choir class
and after school instrumental music are offered to any student,
regardless of academic and program standing, who is interested in
enrolling in these classes.

Key Objectives for Goal 2
[Based on the data conclusions above, identify the key objectives (one
to three) for Goal 2 for the school.]
Objective 1: Ensure that 100% of placements in Special education
programs are correct and appropriate and that all channels for
identifying GATE students are utilized.
Objective 2: Ensure that all students have access to a comprehensive
education that includes opportunities to participate in activities that
go beyond the core curriculum.
Objective 3: Ensure that all English Learners can access the core
curriculum in all subjects via effective use of SDAIE and ELD
techniques.

Key Strategies for Goal 2
[What key strategies will be implemented in order to achieve the
objectives above? Please be as specific as possible in describing how
these strategies will lead to improved student achievement.]
Key Strategy 1: Special education severe to moderate students will, to
the fullest extent possible, be mainstreamed in core subject areas in
order to ensure instruction in grade level standards, including
periodic assessment through application of common benchmark assessments
in math and English language arts.
Key Strategy 2: Improve delivery of special events and programs to
provide intervention and strategic students with increased access to
performing arts, service learning, outdoor education, and school
library-based literacy activities.
Key Strategy 3: Through faculty and monthly professional development
workshops, staff will be trained on "best practices" student engagement
classroom instructional strategies, including SDAIE and ELD strategies.


Goal 3: Instructional Improvement
Improve the instructional delivery to all students using best practices
for student learning as reflected in Focus on Learning recommendations,
compliance, whole school reform models, school-wide programs,
school-based curricular instructional or programmatic improvements.

Data Conclusions related to Goal 3
[Please state your data patterns and trends. In addition, describe
other school level data you may have gathered and analyzed.]
Key Findings:
Though MLK has worked to improve instructional practices, staff
turnover during the past few years necessitates continued professional
development (PD). Most classes are heterogeneously grouped.
Therefore, differentiated instruction is one area in need of on-going
PD. Classroom observations during 2006-2007 have also shown that too
many students are off-task or otherwise unengaged in classroom
instruction. This indicates a need to revisit student engagement
strategies, including checking for understanding. The use of
non-linguistic representations to help students better organize and
retain curriculum content has been a school-wide practice for several
years now, but newer staff members need more training on this strategy.
Additional PD in classroom management strategies is also needed for
some staff members still new to teaching.
Most staff members are well on their way to meeting the requirements
for NCLB's "highly-qualified" status. However, some staff members
(current or new) may need additional professional development and/or
additional college units to reach this goal. The school needs to
monitor and support this process.

Key Objectives for Goal 3
[Based on the data conclusions above, identify the key objectives (one
to three) for Goal 3 for the school.]
Objective 1: Increase staff expertise in instructional practices
designed to better support learning in all subjects.
Objective 2: Expand the professional development opportunities for
staff members, both in the above-mentioned strategies and as needed to
help staff meet the "highly qualified" status requirements of NCLB.


Key Strategies for Goal 3
[What key strategies will be implemented in order to achieve the
objectives above? Please be as specific as possible in describing how
these strategies will lead to improved instructional practice at the
school.]

Key Strategy 1: Utilize both in-house and outside expertise to provide
professional development in key instructional strategies such as
"Checking for Understanding", Marzano's student engagement
instructional strategies, and other "best practices", and monitor their
implementation.
Key Strategy 2: Supplement and improve the current available
professional development sessions through faculty, common planning
time, monthly professional development, Saturdays, and after school
meetings. Staff attendance on Saturdays and after school will be
"strongly encouraged, but optional" and will be appropriately
compensated. When appropriate, professional development can be targeted
to those staff members identified as needing such, reducing the costs
involved. Such targeted PD allows the school to "recognize"
experienced staff members as already being skilled in certain
strategies.
Key Strategy 3: Ensure each staff member completes his/her NCLB
highly-qualified certification process, utilizing available resources
provided through SFUSD.

Goal 4: School Climate
Ensure safe, secure school and learning environment relative to
cleanliness, management of the facility and student behavior.

Data Conclusions for Goal 4
[Please state your data patterns and trends. In addition, describe
other school level data you may have gathered and analyzed.]
Key Findings: The main school climate issues noted in the 2006-2007
Site Plan were insufficient student discipline policies and shared
decision-making procedures. Noah Salzman was utilized as an outside
consultant in strengthening discipline procedures. Shared
decision-making procedures continue to require more emphasis on the
development of a culture of collaboration and consensus building to
maintain the close knit community that staff members have come to
expect as part of the vision of Dr. King.
Most staff has utilized some of Salzman's best practices within
the classroom, though not consistently across the school. There are
still unresolved problems in implementing Salzman procedures outside of
the classroom—hallway behavior, cutting class, and the coverage of the
in-house suspension room. The amount of serious defiant and
disruptive behavior has risen this year. These factors have resulted
in a notable increase in referrals and suspensions. Most notably,
there has been an increase in severe behavior requiring police
involvement. Many staff members feel that the Salzman procedures alone
are not enough to solve these problems. Therefore, in early 2007, the
SSC sent a letter to SFUSD requesting an additional security guard be
allotted to MLK.
Since the school has had significant turnover of staff the past few
years, due mostly to the retirement and advancement of staff members,
many new teachers have come on board. But some have chosen not to stay
with us for very long. Working at MLK is a unique experience that's
both rewarding and challenging, and sometimes frustrating. Reflecting
on this, we realize we need to do a better job in orienting and
supporting new staff members.
The school has revisited its preparedness for disasters and
emergencies, but only briefly this year. More planning and training is
needed to maintain maximum preparedness.
An informal review of Goal 4, using the survey suggested by
SFUSD, also shows that MLK needs to review and improve it's delivery of
the SFUSD Health curriculum and School Health department activities.
Comments made by parents at several recent meetings and staff
observations also indicate a need to repair and/or update several
aspects of the physical safety of the campus, including the outdoor
lighting and outdoor trash receptacles.


Key Objectives for Goal 4
[Based on the data conclusions above, identify the key objectives (one
to three) for Goal 4 for the school.]
Objective 1: Reduce student classroom tardies and students defiant to
adult authority by 25% from the previous year
Objective 2: Achieve 100% implementation of all health and safety
related requirements.
Objective 3: Comparable surveys completed by staff in 2007 and then
2008 will show an increase in new teachers' feelings of comfort and
success in their work at MLK.


Key Strategies for Goal 4
[What key strategies will be implemented in order to achieve the
objectives above? Please be as specific as possible in describing how
these strategies will lead to improved school climate.]
Key Strategy 1: The counseling staff and Learning Support Professional
will coordinate groups of students to improve their social behaviors
and attendance.
Key Strategy 2: The school's Crisis Response Team will attend
professional development sessions sponsored by SHPD, and oversee fire
drills, evacuation plans, and other safety related issues and topics.
Key Strategy 3: Improve new teacher levels of comfort and success
through stronger orientation and support activities.

Goal 5: Parent and Community Involvement
Significantly increase the involvement of a broad base of parents and
community at the school level.

Data Conclusions related to Goal 5
[Please state your data patterns and trends. In addition, describe
other school level data you may have gathered and analyzed.]
Key Findings:
The MLK PTSA does meet on a monthly basis, but the attendance at
meetings is still very low. More incentives are needed to increase
attendance. The meetings to be held for Special Education, GATE , and
English Learner parents have not yet happened, as of the first
semester. Staff members representing these groups need to communicate
with the Parent Liaison to plan and implement these meetings.
However, parent participation during teacher-parent conference weeks
has improved this year. The auto-dialer phone system has been utilized
more frequently than in the past. Elected parents are also active
participants on the SSC. Important documents for parents are usually
translated into Spanish and Chinese. Translators are provided as
needed for parents when communicating with school personnel. The
GEAR-UP program offered a series of workshops on preparing for college,
though attendance was less than desired. The people who did
participate found the program both motivating and informative.
Workshops of this sort should be continued and better publicized so as
to reach more families.
Recently, several parents have inquired as to what else they can do at
home to support their students' academic progress, during the school
year and over the summer to better prepare for the following school
year. Realizing that some parents have little or no spare time, we
couldn't make this a requirement. However, the school can explore ways
to enable interested parents to provide more home support.
Additionally, a suggested summer reading list can be prepared and
distributed to parents of all incoming students.


Key Objectives for Goal 5
[Based on the data conclusions above, identify the key objectives (one
to three) for Goal 5 for the school.]
Objective 1: Attendance at PTSA meetings and other parent/community
focused events will increase 25% over current rates.

Objective 2: Participation in the GEAR-UP program will increase by 25%
over the current year.

Objective 3: Empower willing parents with tools to better support
student academic progress at home.

Key Strategies for Goal 5
[What key strategies will be implemented in order to achieve the
objectives above? Please be as specific as possible in describing how
these strategies will lead to improved parent and community
involvement.]

Key Strategy 1: Develop a more effective system of publicity and
incentives to enhance parent involvement in school events and improve
home-school communication

Key Strategy 2: The school will continue to provide families with
information, activities, and workshops designed to heighten awareness
of and assist in planning for high school and college needs, utilizing
the GEAR-UP program and other available resources. These activities
will be well publicized and participants will be recognized in some
manner for their participation.

Key Strategy 3: Parents will be provided with suggested opportunities
and activities that will enable them to provide additional academic
support for their students at home and over the summer.

ACTION PLAN

The School Site Council has analyzed the academic performance of all
student groups and has considered the effectiveness of key elements of
the instructional program for students failing to meet API and AYP
growth targets. In order to achieve the key objectives and implement
the key strategies set forth in the plan, the following related
actions and expenditures have been adopted to raise the academic
performance of student groups not meeting state standards:

Goal 1: Academic Achievement
Significantly increase academic achievement and learning for all
students, including closing the achievement gap, based on achievement
data. Focus must be on Reading and Mathematics as measured by tests
and other assessments as appropriate.
Actions to be Taken to Reach This Goal
Consider all appropriate dimensions (e.g., Teaching and Learning,
Staffing and Professional Development) Start Date
Completion Date Proposed Expenditures
Funding
Source District Support(s) Needed Key Strategy 1: Improve and expand
the existing student support systems (including SST and SAP) so as to
better address the factors affecting each non-proficient student's
progress. This includes improved monitoring of student support
services.
Lessons will include strategies that reflect scaffolded and
differentiated instruction for all under-performing students and
appropriate modifications of both instruction and grading to better
support students with disabilities.
School site tutorials, community resources, study skills classes, will
be utilized to provide academic and mentoring support for
underperforming students.
The SAP/SST teams will meet at least 1 time a week to review referred
high risk students' academic records and behavior plans and recommend
additional monitoring and added support mechanisms. The referral
process for these programs will be streamlined and monitored for timely
follow-through. List schedule of SST/SAPs in the bulletin.
Counselors will communicate "at-risk student" performance to
parents/guardians each grading period. *(3 or more U in citizenship, or
3 or more referrals, or a GPA < 2.5)
PTSA and teachers will develop and adopt a classroom program to
encourage parent involvement in the homerooms.
Grade level teacher teams will meet regularly with the administration
to review, coordinate, implement underperforming student support
activities.

September - May

September - May

August - May


Each 6-wk. grading period

September - May

.



Federal GEAR UP; SF Promise/AVID; Before/After School program


School Health Programs, Learning Support Professional

Prop H


PTSA Key Strategy 2: Improve the attendance and active class
participation of African American, Latino, and Special Education
through both external and internal incentives and place more emphasis
on engaging culturally relevant delivery of curricula.
The counselors will identify attendance issues. SART will address
problems and will communicate with students and parent/guardians to
improve attendance where needed.
Appropriate incentives such as educational fieldtrips and culturally
relevant speakers will be identified to reward truant-prone students
for improved attendance. (i.e. MUNI passes)
Staff and Grade Level, Department Level will review current curricula
and instructional strategies to identify areas where more culturally
relevant content and activities can be appropriately added to or
substituted.
The school will purchase multiple copies of books to address the
cultural and language diversities of our school site population.
Purchases will emphasize popular student-engaging topics.
The library will offer culturally relevant book clubs and author events
to create a community of readers.

September -May


Ongoing

August - May


Fall, 2008

CA and Federal GEAR UP Grants

Donorschoose.com program

Key Strategy 3: Refine and/or introduce academic and affective
interventions and monitoring/feedback systems to help improve the
academic success of these targeted and focal student groups, the use of
benchmark assessments to re-direct instruction, and implement student
engagement classroom strategies.
Students will be assessed by academic achievement data for placement in
Reading Support classes or for placement in elective classes. All
students will also have a core Language Arts class. Language Arts
teachers will continue to use the state-adopted district-approved
instructional materials in these core classes, supplemented
appropriately by other materials. Reading support classes will use
appropriate materials to supplement the state adopted district approved
curriculum so as to better engage student interest and motivation.
CST "Basic" scoring focal students as defined by the district will be
identified and matched with an on-site mentor/monitor who will provide
friendly informal support and encouragement.
During the Fall Semester, a student in the Reading Support classes will
be eligible to be moved to a regular elective class if they pass two
consecutive benchmark assessments. The Grade Level Teams will make
final determinations of the students based on other formative and
summative assessments. Limitations on class sizes for Elective and
Support classes will be developed so as to anticipate and allow for
this movement. The master schedule will be developed so as to
anticipate and allow for this movement.
The criteria for the support electives exiting will be reviewed by
grade level teams, staff and parents before the end of the first
semester.
All teachers will monitor Focal students' performance on SFUSD's
Benchmark assessments to assist those who need additional support.
These students will be given first priority in After School Program's
tutorial services, teacher-voluntary tutoring during lunch and/or after
school, and other behavioral and academic support services.
Trained teachers will assist other teachers to review, select, practice
grade level and department adoption of student engagement classroom
instructional strategies. Monthly schools' professional development
series of workshops will focus on academic rigor through practicing
these "best practice" classroom strategies.
The administration will facilitate teachers coaching and mentoring each
other in practicing and perfecting instructional strategies.

Aug./Sept.—placed by mid-September

By Mid-October after implementation of 6 week "Second Step" curriculum

Throughout school year


October – May


August – May

September - May
Federal GEAR UP; SF Promise/AVID
and
School Health Department

SF Promise/AVID

MSTLI
SF Promise/AVID
CA GEAR UP

Site Admin


LSP
Monitoring and Assessment for Goal 1
Questions to cover:
How will the school monitor implementation of the high leverage
activities above?
How will the school evaluate its progress towards achieving the desired
objective(s)?
What data will be collected to measure progress?

1. The Administration , UBC and SSC will periodically review, discuss,
and revise as needed the implementation and timelines.

2. The Administration, UBC and SSC will periodically monitor and update
the various data provided to evaluate progress.

3. Student academic progress and movement between the Intervention,
Strategic, and Benchmark categories will be monitored via CST and SFUSD
Benchmark Assessment scores, teacher feedback, and class enrollment
data.

Goal 2: Academic Equity
Ensure that all students have access to a comprehensive education by
providing a high-quality program of studies in the Core Curriculum
areas (English/language arts, mathematics, science, social studies,
visual and performing arts, health and physical education), world
languages, and school-to-career and technical programs where
appropriate.

Actions to be Taken to Reach This Goal
Consider all appropriate dimensions (e.g., Teaching and Learning,
Staffing and Professional Development) Start Date
Completion Date Proposed Expenditures
Funding
Source District Support(s) Needed Key Strategy 1: Review, improve, and
monitor Special Education, ELL, and GATE identification and program
exit procedures, based on core curriculum, and standardized assessment
achievement so as to ensure proper placement. Where possible, efforts
will be made to be balance African American and Latino population in
all school programs. Increased academic success for these groups will
help to reduce the imbalances.
Special Education procedures will be reviewed and monitored to ensure
proper placement of students, according to their eligibility and IEP
requirements.
Access to core curriculum, including textbooks and other materials,
will be implemented for all students including Special Education
students.
Participation in the above programs will be monitored periodically to
gauge student progress.

August - May



AVID?
SF Promise?

SFUSD Content/Program
Specialists Key Strategy 2: Improve delivery of special events
and programs to provide all students with increased access to
performing arts, service learning, ecology, gardening and outdoor
education activities.
School staff will plan and implement periodic assemblies and field
trips to insure that all students have opportunities to learn more
about and participate in visual and performing arts, service learning,
and outdoor education activities.
Visual and Performing arts, choir, and instrumental music classes will
be offered to all students in order to ensure that all students
regardless of program or academic status, have access to these special
classes
The library will offer visits from authors and other literacy related
cultural events.


August through May


Federal GEAR UP
SF Promise/ AVID

Prop H Funds Key Strategy 3: Differentiated instructional and student
engagement strategies through grade level and department level teams
and staff will be introduced in planning meetings and Professional
Development to address the academic and learning style needs of our
diverse student population.
The SFUSD Multi-lingual Department will provide on-site targeted
professional development on SDAIE and ELD expectations and strategies.
Language Arts teachers will actively employ ELD instruction daily,
appropriate to the needs of each class.
Content area teachers will employ SDAIE strategies daily to help EL
students access the core curriculum.

October - May

October - May


Ongoing

Ongoing


Director of Avid


Federal GEAR UP
SF Promise/AVID

Prop H Funds
PD


Multi-lingual Department
Monitoring and Assessment for Goal 2
Questions to cover:
How will the school monitor implementation of the high leverage
activities above?
How will the school evaluate its progress towards achieving the desired
objective(s)?
What data will be collected to measure progress?

1. The SSC, Administration, and UBC will periodically review, discuss,
and revise as needed the implementation and timelines.
Administration will monitor implementation of SDAIE and ELD strategies
through classroom observations.

2. The SSC, Administration and UBC will periodically monitor and update
the various data provided to evaluate progress.

3. Records and documents from professional development sessions will
be saved for review. Enrollment, admission, and demission figures for
Spec. Ed., GATE, and EL students will be disaggregated by grade level
and ethnicity and compared with previous year information and similar
SFUSD information. Records of all assemblies and filed trips will be
maintained in the main office and compared with similar data from
previous years where available.


Goal 3: Instructional Improvement
Improve the instructional delivery to all students using best practices
for student learning as reflected in Focus on Learning recommendations,
compliance, whole school reform models, school-wide programs,
school-based curricular instructional or programmatic improvements.

Actions to be Taken to Reach This Goal
Consider all appropriate dimensions (e.g., Teaching and Learning,
Staffing and Professional Development) Start Date
Completion Date Proposed Expenditures
Funding
Source District Support(s) Needed Key Strategy 1: Utilize both
in-house and outside expertise to provide professional development in
key instructional strategies, and to monitor their implementation.
Within the first 6 weeks, grade level and department level teams will
list and prioritize site professional development needs, with
additional recommended and mandated training activities to be included
through out the school year.
Staff will conduct staff training workshops, with topics to include
differentiation of instruction, Spec. Ed. modifications and grading,
checking for understanding, non-linguistic representations,
think-pair-share, "best practices" student engagement instructional
strategies, and/or others as determined by staff needs.
Differentiation of instruction will be appropriately incorporated
school-wide, and will be a continuing topic for common planning within
grade levels and departments. Best practices will be shared with the
whole staff at faculty professional development meetings
At the start of the school year, teachers will be provided data on the
individual identified learning needs and test scores of the students in
each class so as to assist with planning of appropriate differentiated
instruction.
The librarian and other qualified staff will offer technology and
information literacy workshops and trainings, so that teachers are
comfortable using computers and internet for instruction.

August/Sept. 2008

October - May


September - May

Ongoing


September - May

$11,000 Federal GEAR UP
CA GEAR UP
SF Promise/AVID

Title I

Key Strategy 2: Supplement and improve the current available
professional development sessions with periodic sessions after school.
Staff attendance will be "strongly encouraged, but optional" and will
be appropriately compensated. When appropriate, professional
development may be targeted to those staff members identified as
needing such, reducing the costs involved. Such targeted PD allows the
school to "recognize" experienced staff members as being skilled in
certain strategies.
Periodic professional development sessions will be held during and
after school for staff, who will be encouraged (but optional
attendance). They will be compensated for attending these workshops..
This will allow more intensive and targeted PD to be provided on
various topics deemed more appropriate for this extended time format.
A school site recruitment and interview team, consisting of one parent,
one administrator, one leader of the appropriate content area, one
student from the seventh or eighth grade and one counselor will be
created to address the issue of the school's faculty's annual turnover
rate of teachers. They will assist the principal in marketing the
school and interview candidates for vacancies.

September- May

$11,000

Title I


HR Model Staffing Initiative Key Strategy 3: Assist each staff member
in completing/verifying his/her NCLB highly-qualified certification,
using both site resources, as available, and resources provided through
SFUSD.
Administrators will review the NCLB highly qualified status of each
staff member, and will use this information, according to SFUSD/UESF
contractual requirements, to assign teachers in the Master Schedule
appropriately.
Staff members identified as needing to complete this NCLB certification
will be directed to the proper resources provided by SFUSD for this
purpose.

Spring 2007


Spring/August 2007

Human Resources Dept.


Monitoring and Assessment for Goal 3
Questions to cover:
How will the school monitor implementation of the high leverage
activities above?
How will the school evaluate its progress towards achieving the desired
objective(s)?
What data will be collected to measure progress?
1. The SSC, Administration and UBC will periodically review, discuss,
and revise as needed the implementation and timelines.
Administration will monitor implementation of instructional strategies
through classroom observations.

2. The SSC, Administration and UBC will periodically monitor and update
the various data provided to evaluate progress. Administration will
maintain communication with appropriate SFUSD personnel regarding the
NCLB highly qualified status of each teacher. Progress/problems will
be reported periodically to the UBC and SSC.

3. Records and documents from the professional development sessions
will be provided to the above groups for review. SFUSD will provide
data relevant to NCLB certification requirements and progress.

Goal 4: School Climate
Ensure safe, secure school and learning environment relative to
cleanliness, management of the facility and student behavior.

Actions to be Taken to Reach This Goal
Consider all appropriate dimensions (e.g., Teaching and Learning,
Staffing and Professional Development) Start Date
Completion Date Proposed Expenditures
Funding
Source District Support(s) Needed Key Strategy 1: The counseling staff
and Learning Support Professional will coordinate groups of students to
improve their social behaviors and attendance in and out of class.
Maintain and expand the peer conflict mediation program, the peer
court, and anti-bullying activities.
Use incentive rewards (King Cobra tickets, free dress) to promote
improved school and class attendance and reduced tardies.
Assign security staff so as to effectively monitor hallways between
periods, by increasing the "campus supervisor" position to 3.0 FTE
period.
Involve students through student council meetings and homeroom reports
to assist in a periodic review and of behavior expectations and
discipline procedures, conflict mediation options, incentives, etc.
Explore a Middle School Wellness Center including a school nurse or a
mental health counselor to address underlying problems with at-risk
youths.
Revisit Health Education curriculum and create a Coordinated School
Health Program and the use of clubs to promote appropriate social norms
and infuse health lessons in the curriculum.
Adapt and enforce School Wide Discipline Plan and Uniform Dress policy.
Second Step program will be implemented during the first sixth weeks of
the Unified Arts period for all school site students.

September - May

September - May

September – May


August – May

September – October

Oct. – Update & drill

School Health Dept



School Health Department


Materials & training
via SFUSD Key Strategy 2: The School Safety Team will attend
professional development sessions sponsored by SHPD, and oversee fire
drills, evacuation plans, and other safety related issues and topics
The Science and PE departments will meet with administration and/or
School Health personnel to examine and revise our current
implementation of the mandated health curriculum and to make revisions
as needed.
Identify/train/update staff on emergency procedures, and inform
parents/guardians about such procedures through monthly newsletters and
other communication methods.
Identify, fix and/or update all campus safety-related items, including
outdoor lighting and trash disposal needs.
Implement the "Second Step" six week unified arts program for all
students.
Provide annual First Aid/CPR training for all faculty and staff.

August - October

September – May


September – November
September – October

September - May

.

SFUSD School Health Dept.

Building & Grounds

SFUSD School Health Dept. Key Strategy 3: Improve new teacher levels
of comfort and success through stronger orientation and support
activities.
Hold new teacher meetings weekly during first month of school year and
monthly thereafter. These meetings should be two-way discussions which
help new teachers better adapt to MLK procedures and expectations and
to resolve problems that arise.
Create a Social Activities Club for faculty and staff.

Aug/Sept.- weekly
Oct.-May- monthly

August – May

September


Human Resources Dept./BTSA

Monitoring and Assessment for Goal 4
Questions to cover:
How will the school monitor implementation of the high leverage
activities above?
How will the school evaluate its progress towards achieving the desired
objective(s)?
What data will be collected to measure progress?

1. The Administration,UBC and SSC will periodically review, discuss,
and revise as needed the implementation and timelines.

2. Surveys will be analyzed and appropriate behavior-related data will
be recorded, reviewed, updated and compared with previous years by the
above groups.

3. Surveys will be given out at the conclusion of each semester to
parents, staff, and students to monitor progress made in ensuring a
safe and clean school environment and a well-behaved student body.

Goal 5: Parent and Community Involvement
Significantly increase the involvement of a broad base of parents and
community at the school level.

Actions to be Taken to Reach This Goal
Consider all appropriate dimensions (e.g., Teaching and Learning,
Staffing and Professional Development) Start Date
Completion Date Proposed Expenditures
Funding
Source District Support(s) Needed Key Strategy 1: Develop a more
effective system of publicity and incentives to enhance parent
involvement in school events and improve home-school communication.
A schedule of all parent/community related meetings will be developed
early in the year and will be actively publicized. This will include
meetings for parents of students in specific programs such as Special
Education and GATE. (Staff hours spent presenting at such meetings, if
held beyond the regular school day, will be appropriately compensated.)
The new school web site will reserve a page for communication of events
and activities to/for parents and community.
Develop an effective system for parents and others to communicate with
the school and its various personnel via email.
Send monthly email reminders via the school website and phone tree to
parents regarding school updates, functions, activities, and to check
the school's website for current information.

Back to School Week

August

August - May

Federal and CA GEAR UP grants; SF Promise; Title I

Translation services Key Strategy 2: The school will continue to
provide families with information, activities, and workshops designed
to heighten awareness of and assist in planning for high school and
college needs, utilizing the GEAR-UP program and other available
resources. These activities will be well publicized and participants
will be recognized in some manner for their participation.
Workshops, including those designed through the GEAR-UP program, will
be held for parents/guardians on topics relevant to their role in
preparing middle school students for high school and college. These
will be organized and publicized by the Parent Liaison, the PTSA, and
the GEAR-UP staff.
Publicity will include flyers, email, the auto-dialer, phone tree, the
new school website, and community newspaper/newsletters.
Free dress and/or other incentives will be awarded to the students from
families participating in these workshops. San Bruno Ave, merchant
discount coupons and/or other incentives will be awarded to the adults
and/or students from families participating in these workshops.

September - May

Federal and CA GEAR UP grants; SF Promise; Title I


Key Strategy 3: Parents will be provided with suggested
opportunities and activities that will enable them to provide
additional academic support for their students at home and over the
summer.
Maintain and expand percentage of families using Home Test Prep
materials effectively.
The Language Arts Department and Librarian will jointly generate a
suggested Summer Reading List for students entering each new grade
level.
Support staff will provide parents with additional opportunities to
support student academic progress at home and better prepare students
for the following school year.

January-March 2009

April - May
Federal and CA GEAR UP grants; SF Promise; Title I


SFUSD State and Federal programs



Monitoring and Assessment for Goal 5
Questions to cover:
How will the school monitor implementation of the high leverage
activities above?
How will the school evaluate its progress towards achieving the desired
objective(s)?
What data will be collected to measure progress?

1. The Administration , SSC, and UBC will periodically review,
discuss, and revise as needed the implementation and timelines.

2. Surveys will be analyzed and appropriate behavior-related data will
be recorded, reviewed, updated and compared with previous years by the
above groups.

3. Records of attendance and publicity documents will be kept for all
parent/community events and made available to the above groups for
review and evaluation purposes. Surveys will be given out at the
conclusion of each semester to parents to assess their level of
participation and satisfaction with parent related activities and
home/school communications.

School Site Council (SSC) Membership

Education Code Section 64001 requires that this plan be reviewed and
updated at least annually, including proposed expenditures of funds
allocated to the through the Consolidated Application, by the school
site council. The current make-up of the council is as follows:


Name of Member

Member's Signature
Principal Classroom
Teacher Other School Staff Parent or
Community
Member Secondary Student Date Elected Gilbert Cho X James
Galgano X April Holland X Christopher
Miller X Dianne Reynolds X Lloyd
Schuknecht X Nancy Folauoo X Patricia Koka X Kay
Dorsey X Terezinha Jusino X Carlos Ramirez X Rocio
Ramirez X Cheryl Taylor X Johnson Chen X Sabreen
Khalil X Jonathan Ramirez X Numbers of members of each
category 1 5 2 5 3 At elementary schools, the council must be
constituted to ensure parity between (a) the principal, classroom
teachers and other school personnel and (b) parents of pupils attending
the school or other community members. Classroom teachers must
comprise a majority of persons represented under section (a). At
secondary schools there must, in addition, be equal numbers of parents
or other community members selected by parents, and students.
Teachers, other school personnel, parents and (at secondary schools)
students select representatives to the council (Education Code 52012).
For schools participating in the Immediate
Intervention/Underperforming Schools Program, the local governing board
must appoint a "broad-based schoolsite and community team" (Education
Code 52054(a)). The board may meet this requirement in either of the
following ways:
Add one or more "nonschoolsite personnel" to an existing school site
council to form the "school site and community team"; or
Appoint a "school site and community team" unrelated to the membership
of the school site council.
English Learner Advisory Committee (ELAC) Membership


Name of Member

Member's Signature Principal Classroom
Teacher Other School Staff Parent of EL Student Other Parent /
Community Secondary Student Date Elected Gilbert Cho X



Numbers of members of each category

The composition of the English Learner Advisory Committee ( ELAC) must
contain parents of EL students.
The percentage of parents of EL students is to be at least the same as
that of EL students at the school.
School Advisory Committee (SAC) Membership


Name of Member

Member's Signature
Principal Classroom
Teacher Other School Staff Parent or
Community
Member Secondary Student Date
Elected

Numbers of members of each category

The composition of the School Advisory Council must be such that it
contains a majority of parents.

Recommendations and Assurances

The school site council recommends this school plan and its related
expenditures to the district governing board for approval, and assures
the board of the following:

The school site council is correctly constituted, and was formed in
accordance with district governing board policy and state law.
The school site council reviewed its responsibilities under state law
and district governing board policies, including those board policies
relating to material changes in the school plan requiring board
approval.
The school site council sought and considered all recommendations from
the following groups or committees before adopting this plan (Check
those that apply):
___ School Advisory Committee for State Compensatory Education Programs
___ English Learner Advisory Committee
___ Community Advisory Committee for Special Education Programs
___ Gifted and Talented Education Program Advisory Committee
___ Other (list)

The school site council reviewed the content requirements for school
plans of programs included in this Single Plan for Student Achievement,
and believes all such content requirements have been met, including
those found in district governing board policies and in the Local
Improvement Plan.
This school plan is based upon a thorough analysis of student academic
performance. The actions proposed herein form a sound, comprehensive,
coordinated plan to reach stated school goals to improve student
academic performance.
The school held two (2) community meetings prior to the completion of
the school site plan.
One meeting to gather input from the school community including all
advisory committees DATE: February 6, 2007
One meeting to present plan upon its completion.
DATE: March 3, 2007
This school plan was adopted by the school site council on: March 13,
2007.
Our site has a process and budget for replacing lost or damaged
textbooks as well as a process for managing textbooks to ensure that
each student has standards-aligned textbooks or other required
instructional materials to use in class or to use at home in order to
complete required homework assignments.
Our site uses an IEP Master Calendar to ensure compliance with Special
Education timelines.

Attested:
Gilbert Cho 3/16/07
_________________________ _______________________ ________
Typed name of school principal Signature of school principal Date
Christopher Miller 3/16/07
_________________________ _______________________ ________
Typed name of SSC chairperson Signature of SSC chairperson Date


See Appendix B: Chart of Requirements for the SPSA for content
required by each program or funding source supporting this goal.
List the date an action will be taken or will begin, and the date it
will be completed.
See Appendix B: Chart of Requirements for the SPSA for content
required by each program or funding source supporting this goal.
List the date an action will be taken or will begin, and the date it
will be completed.
See Appendix B: Chart of Requirements for the SPSA for content
required by each program or funding source supporting this goal.
List the date an action will be taken or will begin, and the date it
will be completed.
See Appendix B: Chart of Requirements for the SPSA for content
required by each program or funding source supporting this goal.
List the date an action will be taken or will begin, and the date it
will be completed.
See Appendix B: Chart of Requirements for the SPSA for content
required by each program or funding source supporting this goal.
List the date an action will be taken or will begin, and the date it
will be completed.

PAGE 1



PAGE 7


PAGE 1


PAGE 28

Tuesday, March 11, 2008

DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING JR ACADEMIC MIDDLE SCHOOL

DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING JR ACADEMIC MIDDLE SCHOOL
EMERGENCY SCHOOL SITE COUNCIL SITE PLAN MEETING

MARCH 13, 2008 AT 4:15PM IN THE SCHOOL LIBRARY

AGENDA: REVIEW AND FINALIZE 2008-2009 SCHOOL SITE PLAN

Monday, March 10, 2008

SCHOOL SITE COUNCIL MONTHLY MEETING WILL BE ON TUESDAY,MARCH 11TH, 2008 AT 4:30PM IN THE SCHOOL LIBRARY

Dear Michael McCachren: SSC Chair

IN LIGHT OF THE FOLLOWING FACTS:

1. THE SSC SITE PLAN COMMITTEE MET FOR TWO WEEKS AND REVISED THE
2008-2009 SITE PLAN GOALS, STRATEGIES AND ACTIONS TO CONTINUE TO
INCLUDE THE "UBC" AS PART OF THE "SSC"SHARED DECISION MAKING BODY ALONG
WITH ADMINISTRATION, UBC AND SSC TO REVIEW, DISCUSS AND REVISE RELEVANT
INFORMATION REGARDING EACH GOALS IMP;EMENTATION TO INSURE SFUSD/UESF
CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS PERTAINING TO EACH GOAL …ETC
2. OUR ONGOING APPROVED SSC BYLAWS STAETE AND INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:
Appendix A
MLK SSC DOMAINS (And Decision-making Groups)
" STATE THAT "UESF Staff Domain: All decision-making activities and
roles specified in the UESF Contract, including (but not limited to)
concurrence on the common planning time schedule and the goal of shared
consensus with administration on areas of curriculum, budget,
scheduling, staffing, assignment, and professional development"
ARTICLE VI: Committees
a) The SSC may as needed establish standing or special committees. Such
committees will make recommendations for action to the SSC, but the
decision-making authority still rests with the SSC.
3. 52853. (a) The schoolsite council shall develop a school plan which
shall include all of the following:
(1) Curricula, instructional strategies and materials responsive
to the individual needs and learning styles of each pupil.
(2) Instructional and auxiliary services to meet the special needs
of non-English-speaking or limited-English-speaking pupils,
including instruction in a language these pupils understand;
educationally disadvantaged pupils; gifted and talented pupils; and
pupils with exceptional needs.
(3) A staff development program for teachers, other school
personnel, paraprofessionals, and volunteers, including those
participating in special programs. Staff development programs may
include the use of program guidelines that have been developed by the
superintendent for specific learning disabilities, including
dyslexia, and other related disorders. The strategies included in
the guidelines and instructional materials that focus on successful
approaches for working with pupils who have been prenatally substance
exposed, as well as other at-risk pupils, may also be provided to
teachers.
(4) Ongoing evaluation of the educational program of the school.
(5) Other activities and objectives as established by the council.

(6) The proposed expenditures of funds available to the school
through the programs described in Section 52851. For purposes of
this subdivision, proposed expenditures of funds available to the
school through the programs described in Section 52851 shall include,
but not be limited to, salaries and staff benefits for persons
providing services for those programs.
(7) The proposed expenditure of funds available to the school
through the federal Improving America's Schools Act of 1994 (IASA)
(20 U.S.C. Sec. 6301 et seq.) and its amendments. If the school
operates a state-approved schoolwide program pursuant to Section 6314
of Title 20 of the United States Code in a manner consistent with
the expenditure of funds available to the school pursuant to Section
52851, employees of the schoolwide program may be deemed funded by a
single cost objective.
(b) The schoolsite council shall annually review the school plan,
establish a new budget, and if necessary, make other modifications in
the plan to reflect changing needs and priorities.

4) 52855. The school district governing board shall review and approve
or disapprove school plans. A school plan shall not be approved
unless it was developed and recommended by the school site council.
If a plan is not approved by the governing board, specific reasons
for that action shall be communicated to the council. Modifications
to any school plan shall be developed, recommended and approved or
disapproved in the same manner.

5) SFUSD > Departments > State and Federal Funded Projects > Advisory
Committee Information
School Site Council (SSC)
"The basic principle underlying the establishment of the School Site
Council (SSC) is that those individuals who are most affected by the
operation of their school should have a major role in the decisions
regarding how their school functions. This involvement occurs through
the development of a school improvement plan, including a budget which
is reflective and supportive of the plan, the continuous review of the
implementation of the plan, and the assessment of the effectiveness of
the plan, and the ongoing review and updating of the school plan."

6) "TASKS - The SSC:
1 Considers participation in SBCP.
2 Considers which state approved funding sources to be used and how
services will be coordinated at the school site.
3 Develops a new or revise a previously approved comprehensive school
plan designed to effectively coordinate school services and resources.
4 Annually establishes a school budget.
5 May request, as part of the school plan, release days to advise
students or conduct staff development activities.
6 Consults with other school advisory committees on the contents of
the school plan affecting their programs.
7 Designs a system to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the
school plan.
8 Annually recommends the school plan to the governing board for
approval.
9 Requests through the governing board, waivers on the SBCP law. "

7) "52016 and subdivisions (a) and (b) of Section 52017; the capacity
of school personnel to implement school improvement programs; and the
capacity of school site councils to monitor and evaluate programs
authorized by this chapter.
(b) Be designed and implemented by classroom teachers and other
participating school personnel, including the school principal, with
the aid of outside personnel as necessary. Classroom teachers shall
comprise the majority of any group designated to design staff
development programs for instructional personnel to be established
pursuant to this article. Development activities for members of the
school site council shall be designed in conjunction with such members.
(c) Allow for diversity in staff development activities, including,
but not limited to, small groups, self-directed learning, and
systematic observation during visits to other classrooms or schools.
(d) Be conducted during time when is set aside throughout the school
year, including, but not limited to, time on a continuing basis when
school personnel are released from their regular duties.
(e) Be evaluated and modified on a continuing basis by participating
school personnel, paraprofessionals, and volunteers with the aid of
outside personnel as necessary."

8) " 52021. The school site council, following approval of a school
improvement plan by the governing board, shall have ongoing
responsibility to review with the principal, teachers, other school
personnel and pupils the implementation of the school improvement
program and to assess periodically the effectiveness of such program.
The council shall annually review the school improvement plan,
establish a new school improvement budget consistent with subdivision
(f) of Section 52015, and, if necessary, make other modifications in
the plan to reflect changing improvement needs and priorities."

9)" 52034. Participating school district governing boards shall:
(a) Review and approve or disapprove planning applications and
school improvement plans consistent with, but not limited to, rules and
regulations adopted by the State Board of Education pursuant to Section
52039.
No plan shall be approved unless it was developed and recommended by
a school site council. In the event any plan is not approved by the
governing board, specific reasons for this action shall be communicated
to the council. Modifications to any school improvement plan shall be
developed, recommended, and approved or disapproved in the same
manner."

10) "32281. (a) Each school district and county office of education is
responsible for the overall development of all comprehensive school
safety plans for its schools operating kindergarten or any of grades
1 to 12, inclusive.
(b) (1) Except as provided in subdivision (d) with regard to a
small school district, the schoolsite council established pursuant to
Section 52012 or 52852 shall write and develop a comprehensive school
safety plan relevant to the needs and resources of that
particular school.
(2) The schoolsite council may delegate this responsibility to a
school safety planning committee made up of the following members:
(A) The principal or the principal's designee.
(B) One teacher who is a representative of the recognized
certificated employee organization.
(C) One parent whose child attends the school.
(D) One classified employee who is a representative of the
recognized classified employee organization.
(E) Other members, if desired.
(3) The schoolsite council shall consult with a representative from
a law enforcement agency in the writing and development of the
comprehensive school safety plan.
(4) In the absence of a schoolsite council, the members specified
in paragraph (2) shall serve as the school safety planning committee.

32282. (a) The comprehensive school safety plan shall include, but
not be limited to, both of the following:
(1) Assessing the current status of school crime committed on
school campuses and at school-related functions.
(2) Identifying appropriate strategies and programs that will
provide or maintain a high level of school safety and address the
school's procedures for complying with existing laws related to
school safety, which shall include the development of all of the
following:
(A) Child abuse reporting procedures consistent with Article 2.5
(commencing with Section 11164) of Title 1 of Part 4 of the Penal
Code.
(B) Disaster procedures, routine and emergency, including
adaptations for pupils with disabilities in accordance with the
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12101 et
seq.). The disaster procedures shall also include, but not be
limited to, both of the following:
(i) Establishing an earthquake emergency procedure system in every
public school building having an occupant capacity of 50 or more
pupils or more than one classroom. A district or county office may
work with the Office of Emergency Services and the Seismic Safety
Commission to develop and establish the earthquake emergency
procedure system. The system shall include, but not be limited to,
all of the following:
(I) A school building disaster plan, ready for implementation at
any time, for maintaining the safety and care of pupils and staff.
(II) A drop procedure whereby each pupil and staff member takes
cover under a table or desk, dropping to his or her knees, with the
head protected by the arms, and the back to the windows. A drop
procedure practice shall be held at least once each school quarter in
elementary schools and at least once a semester in secondary
schools.
(III) Protective measures to be taken before, during, and
following an earthquake.
(IV) A program to ensure that pupils and both the certificated and
classified staff are aware of, and properly trained in, the
earthquake emergency procedure system.
(ii) Establishing a procedure to allow a public agency, including
the American Red Cross, to use school buildings, grounds, and
equipment for mass care and welfare shelters during disasters or
other emergencies affecting the public health and welfare. The
district or county office shall cooperate with the public agency in
furnishing and maintaining the services as the district or county
office may deem necessary to meet the needs of the community.
(C) Policies pursuant to subdivision (d) of Section 48915 for
pupils who committed an act listed in subdivision (c) of Section
48915 and other school-designated serious acts which would lead to
suspension, expulsion, or mandatory expulsion recommendations
pursuant to Article 1 (commencing with Section 48900) of Chapter 6 of
Part 27.
(D) Procedures to notify teachers of dangerous pupils pursuant to
Section 49079.
(E) A discrimination and harassment policy consistent with the
prohibition against discrimination contained in Chapter 2 (commencing
with Section 200) of Part 1.
(F) The provisions of any schoolwide dress code, pursuant to
Section 35183, that prohibits pupils from wearing "gang-related
apparel," if the school has adopted that type of a dress code. For
those purposes, the comprehensive school safety plan shall define
"gang-related apparel." The definition shall be limited to apparel
that, if worn or displayed on a school campus, reasonably could be
determined to threaten the health and safety of the school
environment. Any schoolwide dress code established pursuant to this
section and Section 35183 shall be enforced on the school campus and
at any school-sponsored activity by the principal of the school or
the person designated by the principal. For the purposes of this
paragraph, "gang-related apparel" shall not be considered a protected
form of speech pursuant to Section 48950.
(G) Procedures for safe ingress and egress of pupils, parents, and
school employees to and from school.
(H) A safe and orderly environment conducive to learning at the
school.
(I) The rules and procedures on school discipline adopted pursuant
to Sections 35291 and 35291.5.
(J) Hate crime reporting procedures pursuant to Chapter 1.2
(commencing with Section 628) of Title 15 of Part 1 of the Penal
Code.
(b) It is the intent of the Legislature that schools develop
comprehensive school safety plans using existing resources, including
the materials and services of the partnership, pursuant to this
chapter. It is also the intent of the Legislature that schools use
the handbook developed and distributed by the School/Law Enforcement
Partnership Program entitled "Safe Schools: A Planning Guide for
Action" in conjunction with developing their plan for school safety.

(c) Grants to assist schools in implementing their comprehensive
school safety plan shall be made available through the partnership as
authorized by Section 32285.
(d) Each schoolsite council or school safety planning committee in
developing and updating a comprehensive school safety plan shall,
where practical, consult, cooperate, and coordinate with other
schoolsite councils or school safety planning committees.
(e) The comprehensive school safety plan may be evaluated and
amended, as needed, by the school safety planning committee, but
shall be evaluated at least once a year, to ensure that the
comprehensive school safety plan is properly implemented. An updated
file of all safety-related plans and materials shall be readily
available for inspection by the public.
(f) The comprehensive school safety plan, as written and updated
by the schoolsite council or school safety planning committee, shall
be submitted for approval under subdivision (a) of Section 32288.

32289. A complaint of noncompliance with the school safety planning
requirements of Title IV of the federal No Child Left Behind Act of
2001, 20 U.S.C. Sec. 7114(d)(7), may be filed with the department
under the Uniform Complaint Procedures as set forth in Chapter 5.1
(commencing with Section 4600) of Title 5 of the California Code of
Regulations. "

11) "SB 65 SB 65
School-Based Pupil Motivation and Maintenance Program Guidelines

1. What is a school site council?
The school site council (SSC) is an essential element of SB 65 M&M
schools,
School Improvement Programs (SIPs), and School-Based Coordinated
Programs (SBCPs). The underlying principle of the SSC is that those
individuals most affected by the operation of a specific categorical
program should have a major role in the decisions on how that program
should function. This involvement occurs through the development of the
school plan, including a budget that reflects and supports the plan;
continuous review of the plan'simplementation; assessment of the plan's
effectiveness; and ongoing review and revision of the plan. The SSC is
a council of school employees, parents, and community members. In
secondary schools the SSC includes students. Each school receiving an
SB 65 School-Based Pupil Motivation and Maintenance (M&M) Program grant
or SIP funding or any school identifying itself as
"school-based-coordinated" agrees to abide by the related provisions of
the School-Based Program Coordination (SBPC) Act incorporated into the
provisions of SB 65. Among these provisions is the requirement to set
up a duly constituted school site council and to submit an annual plan
and budget.

2. What is the role of the SSC in an SB 65 school?
The SSC is both a consultative and a determinative body constituted to
provide recommendations for the use of state categorical funds and
services. It is made up of all elements of the school community (i.e.,
the principal, teachers, other staff, parents, and, at the secondary
level, students). The SSC oversees the SB 65 M&M program at the school
site. Specifically, it must approve (1) the annual school dropout
prevention plan; (2) the SB 65 budget for the year and the expenditure
for the salary and expenses of the outreach consultant position; and
(3) the duties of the outreach consultant at the school. The SSC may
also perform the functions of the school advisory committee required of
all Title I schools (EC sections 52858 and 54723). If
English learner services are coordinated in a school-based program, the
SSC must first consult with the school's bilingual advisory committee
(EC Section
52858.5). Specifically, the SSC is required to approve the dropout
prevention plan mentioned previously to meet the needs of those
students "at high risk of
not succeeding in the regular school program" (EC Section 54726 (d)).
Those students are the low performing, educationally disadvantaged
(Title I identifiable
students); the non-English-speaking or limited-English-speaking
students (English learners); the gifted and talented (GATE) students;
the individuals with exceptional needs (special education); and all
other students who are not succeeding and are in danger of failing or
dropping out of school. "

12) "52855. The school district governing board shall review and
approve
or disapprove school plans. A school plan shall not be approved
unless it was developed and recommended by the school site council.
If a plan is not approved by the governing board, specific reasons
for that action shall be communicated to the council. Modifications
to any school plan shall be developed, recommended and approved or
disapproved in the same manner."

13) " SFUSD SITE PLAN…. Decision-Making Guidelines
School Site Councils are required at every school as a condition for
participation in certain
state and federally funded programs. SFUSD has expanded the role of the
SSC to include
oversight of the academic plan and budget, a recognition that all
stakeholders (students,
parents, community members, teachers, other staff and principals) must
contribute to the
success of the school.
School principals are the critical leaders at school sites. They are
responsible for
establishing a vision for improving achievement for all students.
Principals are ultimately
accountable for achieving the goals of the school and the district.
Therefore, principals
must ensure that the academic plan and budget are focused on meeting
the identified needs
of all students.
If principals or any other members of School Site Councils are not
confident that an
academic plan, as drafted, is adequately focused needs of all students,
they should use the
dispute resolution process described on page 11 to have their concerns
heard.
The following table outlines the respective roles of the District,
School Site Councils, and
school principals in developing plans for raising student achievement
and for carrying out
those plans.
Dispute Resolution
Any concerns about the decisions of School Site Councils (e.g., an SSC
reaches an impasse
or a party affected by an SSC decision raises a procedural question)
shall be directed to the
Assistant Superintendent supervising the school. The Assistant
Superintendent will
determine what next steps are necessary, including but not limited to
mediation or dispute
resolution.
If dispute resolution is necessary, the following process will apply:
• A Dispute Resolution Team will be formed consisting of the Chief of
School
Operations, the supervising Assistant Superintendent for the school, a
representative from SFUSD's Equity Assurance Office, and (where
relevant)
representatives of bargaining units.
• The Team will assemble a meeting within one week of contact to hear
from the
disputants. Meetings will be open to all elected members of the SSC. The
structure of the meeting will be as follows:
o Presentations by disputants (including any written materials that the
parties
to the dispute wish for the Team to review)
o Presentation by mediator, where applicable, including the process of
mediation and the suggested resolution
o Deliberation and decision (without disputants or other SSC members
present) by the Dispute Resolution Team
• Within one week of the meeting, the Team will communicate its
decision in
writing to all disputants and members of the SSC. Grievance procedures
and the
Uniform Complaint process represent an opportunity for appeal."

14) "(Education Code Section 35147)

Records
The school needs to maintain the following documentation for 5 years:

l Orientation and election notifications
l Council roster and ballots
l By-laws (if adopted)
l Meetings flyers/notification
l Agendas of council meetings
l Minutes of meetings
(discussions, recommendations and actions)
l Recordings of attendance (sign-in sheets)
l Evidence of input from school advisory committees
(CEAC, ELAC, other advisory committees)
l Official correspondence
l School plan including budgets

Other Committees
The SSC may appoint committees or individuals to serve and advise at
their discretion. SSC minutes must document the purpose and decisions
of appointees.
Appointees may:
1. Gather and analyze data.
2. Propose strategies for improving instruction.
3. Examine materials and funding to determine effectiveness.
4. Draft portions of the SPSA for council consideration.

SSC Bylaws
Bylaws should clarify such matters as:

l Duration of terms for members and officers
l Election procedures
l Meeting times
l Quorum requirements
l Attendance procedures
l Means of electing members and officers
l Notice of elections for each peer group
l Responsibilities of the council
l A policy of non-discrimination
l Election of alternate members

The Consolidated Application
The Consolidated Application (ConApp) is an
agreement between the District and the State
Board of Education on the use of categorical
funds.
- The approved Con App is the document that auditors and compliance
review personnel use to determine compliance with state and federal
mandates.
Single Plan for Student Achievement
Senate Bill 374
Requires each school to consolidate all plans required by Consolidated
Application Programs into a Single Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA).

(Education Code Sections 64001 [d],[f])

The intent of the Single Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) is to
create a cycle of continuous improvement of student performance, and to
ensure that all students succeed in reaching state academic standards.
The school plan serves as an official document in audits to determine
appropriate expenditures of categorical funds, including equipment
purchases, and personnel responsible to complete multifunded and
semiannual certifications
Step 1: Measure the Effectiveness of Current Improvement
Strategies
l Analyze Student Performance
l Analyze the Instructional Program
Step 2: Seek Input from School Advisory Committees

The SSC must document the following actions:
l Written recommendations from advisory committee(s)
l Consideration of recommendations at SSC meeting
l Dissemination of information regarding the SPSA to advisory
committee(s)
l Share final draft with advisory committee(s)
l Recommendation for approval of the SPSA to Local District
Note: If the SSC chairperson refuses to certify input, the minutes and
sign-in sheets from the meeting where the approval was granted must be
submitted with the SPSA. The local district superintendent or designee
will decide whether to approve or send SPSA back to SSC for revision.

Step 3: Reaffirm or Revise School Goals
School goals must be based on comprehensive assessment of student
academic achievement, using multiple measures of student performance.
Step 4: Revise Improvement Strategies and Expenditures
The SSC will adopt specific actions to reach each goal, specify dates
by which actions are to be started and completed, identify expenditures
needed to implement the action, and identify the funding source.
Step 5: Approve and Recommend the SPSA to the Governing Board

After appropriate advisory committees have reviewed the proposed SPSA,
the SSC must approve it at a meeting for which a public notice has been
posted.

The Board of Education has delegated to the general superintendent and
the local district superintendents responsibility for budget and
program decisions related to SB1X and Title I Program Improvement
schools, which includes schools in corrective action and restructuring.

Restructuring Plans must be approved by the local district
superintendent before implementation.
Note: For schools identified as Program Improvement (PI), the SSC
remains in place
Step 6: Monitor Implementation
Once the plan is approved, the responsibility of the SSC
is to monitor the effectiveness of planned activities and
modify those that prove ineffective.

Monitoring should follow the calendar of events
established by the SPSA to verify timely implementation
and achievement of objectives critical to the success of
the plan.
[Education Code Section 64001(g)]

Local District Office Responsibilities
l Certify the election and monitor the proper functioning of the SSC.
l Investigate and resolve concerns relating to the SSC.
l Provide leadership and training for SSC members.
l Assist with the analysis of school data to determine student needs.
l Provide guidance and assistance in the development, including
expenditures, of the SPSA.
l Review and recommend the SPSA for approval to Specially Funded
Programs
l Maintain SSC Certification forms.
l Approve the Single Plan for Student Achievement and its subsequent
revisions
l Review SPSA for compliance with the Local Educational Agency (LEA)
plan required for federal funding.
l Provide technical assistance to the local district on all federal and
state mandates.
Maintain SSC/CEAC/ELAC Certification forms. "

15) YOUR FOLLOWING STAEMENT FROM DECEMBER 2007 AS SSC CHAIR:
"My Two Cents Worth: 9 DEC'07 (Regarding the Drawing up of the '08
Site Plan)

" The UBC has been a part of the MLK SSC from the start. And that is
largely because site leadership in the past held dual positions, both
as UBC site representative and as SSC chairperson. Mr. Chris Miller,
our recent IRF is a case in point. And both sides seemed to have been
well served during his tenure and that of others. I learned much from
Mr. Miller as he served ably in both roles.

As SSC chair, I came to appreciate the authentic voice the UBC offered
on current site matters, taking over as it did from the Leadership
Committee of earlier days. I learned that a great deal of "buy in" from
the faculty and staff on issues, came with faculty SSC members who were
also UBC members. In fact, the first SSC (pioneering) site plan at King
was drawn up largely by UBC members. The integrity of this first
document and the support it received from site parents, faculty,
students and staff was due to the efforts of SSC and UBC members
working together in a common "shared decison-making" effort.

To exclude any stakeholder at site, be they student leaders, parents,
friends of the school or UBC or other affiliated members is to provoke
controversy and bring about division and suspicion. One of the great
attributes of this site has been the transparent and welcoming
opportunities that remain open to any one on or off site who wants to
contribute to the success of this school. This is a small school with a
mighty legacy, made possible by the cooperation shown over the years by
the various groups that work together to better this school. After
all, it is still only and all about our students. They require
everyone's input. Mike McCachren, Chair."

16) " 21. Restructuring
(See Appendix C and D for Article 21, Restructuring from prior
contracts.)
Appendix C: Faltus – Byrd Memo
March 24,1994
To: Restructuring School Communities
From: Mary Welsh Byrd, Program Director State and Federal Funded
Projects (SFFP)
Rudi Faltus, District/Union Coordinator Restructuring Schools
Initiative (RSI)
Re: Restructuring Shared Decision-Making Structures and School Site
Councils

SDM STRUCTURES
An important component of both the Restructuring Schools Initiative
(RSI) and the
School-Based Program Coordination Act is the establishment and use of
sdm structures
involving all of the key members of the school community
(administrators, teachers,
parents, classified staff, and students) to determine what needs
improvement or revision,
and then to make the changes necessary to improve student learning.
Authority for shared
decision-making regarding district programs is derived from RSI.
Authority for shared
decision-making regarding state supplementary programs is derived from
the
School-Based Program Coordination Act.

The sdm structure is the legally responsible decision-making structure
of the school in
Stage Two and Stage Three restructuring (RSI) schools. Schools develop
different names
to identify their site sdm structures. All members of the staff and
school community
members (administrators, teachers, classified staff, students, parents,
community
organizations, etc.) should be involved in work groups reflecting all
of the work that is
important and needs to be done. The sdm structure acts as the
coordinating body,
reflecting all of the needs, plans and activities of the working
groups. The sdm structure
develops processes among itself or for involving others in prioritizing
needs and plans.
Within SFUSD, the onesite (school) plan is the vehicle for expressing
programs and
budget allocations for the district-based and supplemental programs at
the site. A major
piece of the work of the sdm structure, therefore, is planning and
developing this one-site
plan, involving the total school community. The sdm structure in a
restructuring school is the body responsible for decisions made by the
school community, replacing the principal alone.

Option 1: (Ccurrently USED BY OUR SCHOOL SITE)
Form a school governance/restructuring team that meets the statutory
requirements for a school-based coordinated School Site Council (SSC):
50% parents
and community members (or 25% parent and community members and 25%
students
in secondary schools) and 50% school employees, including the
principal, a majority
of teachers, and classified staff. Each SSC would establish written
bylaws for the SSC
that would require all stakeholders (teachers, parents, students,
administration,
classified employees) to come to consensus on major issues before
action is taken. A
fallback provision if consensus cannot be reached and a decision has to
be made also
needs to be written into the bylaws. The SSC will recognize the
importance of having
all existing advisory groups and new committees develop and implement
restructuring and improvement projects connected to the SSC. These
relationships will also be reflected in the site's SSC bylaws.

COMPOSITION
Stage Two restructuring schools develop a shared decision-making (sdm)
structure to
involve key stakeholders in collectively planning, developing,
implementing, and
assessing district programs, processes, and budgets at the site. These
sdm structures work
within district processes unless waivers to the regular process are
obtained. These sdm
structures derive their authority from the Restructuring Council which
was created
through the UESF contract. The specific composition of the structure is
to be determined
by the site, and is guided by the following contract language:

21.2.3. Participation in the process will be open to all with
responsibility for student
outcomes, such as teachers, united support personnel, administrators,
classified staff, parents, students, and others, as determined by the
site.
(UESF Contract, Article 21)
21.2.7. The Union Building Committee will serve as the initial conduit
to the process
of restructuring. A shared decision-making structure must be
established to
include teachers, united support personnel, the UBC representative,
administrators, parents, and others as determined by the site. (UESF
Contract, Article 21, Restructuring.)

2004-2007 Teacher Contract – 137 – June 30, 2006
The major principle and intent of both RSI and SBCP is inclusion of key
stakeholders in
the shared decision-making process. If the SSC is used as the shared
decision-making
structure for a restructuring school, the following points need to be
kept in mind:
• The principal has to be on the SSC.
• There should be at least three other than classroom teacher employees
in the other
employee categories: at least one representing united support personnel
(instructional
aides, community relations specialists and security aides), at least
one representing
Local 790 classified employees (secretaries, custodians, cafeteria
workers, etc) and at
least one representing other non-administrative certificated employees
who are not
classroom teachers (counselors, resource teachers, librarians, etc.).
This assumes, of
course, that there are people in all of these roles at the site.
• A Union Building Committee (UBC) representative needs to be on the
SSC. If the
UBC representative is the Building Rep, he/she would not need to be
elected to the
SSC, as the Building Rep has already been elected by peers. The
Building Rep would
fill one of the classroom teacher positions, or other staff positions
as applicable.
Students in elementary schools would serve on the SSC on the parent and
community
side, if desired. Student participation in middle and high schools is
required by the
SBCP, and is to be a quarter of the total number of members. The number
of student
representatives in elementary school should be less than the number of
parent and
community representatives, so as not to diminish the number of parent
and
community representatives significantly.
• The SSC composition is proportional, but the site has flexibility in
determining
numbers and roles that need to be represented within the state-defined
composition.
Reaching consensus on the numbers, and understanding the differences
between a
SSC for SIP, SB 65 SBCP and a restructuring school is critical.
• The Faculty Advisory Council, School Advisory Committee, Bilingual
Advisory Committee, PTSA, Student Council, etc. all represent
constituent voices that need to be heard.

• It can be appropriate to move members onto the SSC from other
advisory committees
if they have been elected by their peers if the group is in agreement.
For instance,
teachers elected to a Faculty Advisory Council by teachers can serve on
the SSC,
students elected to a Student Council by students can serve on the SSC,
etc.
• Reaching consensus on the numbers of representatives, criteria for
representatives,
nomination process and election procedures or selection process among
the staff and
student community is recommended.
• SFFP guidelines for parent and community member elections published
in the WAD
are important and assist in keeping the school in compliance with state
and federal
regulations.
SCOPE OF AUTHORITY
Authority for shared decision-making regarding district programs is
derived from
Restructuring Schools Initiative (RSI), and authority for shared
decision-making
regarding state supplementary programs is derived from the School-Based
Program
Coordination Act. The sdm structure, therefore, derives its authority
from both the
SFUSD and the California State Department of Education. The intent of
both the district
and the state is to shift authority to the school site. As
restructuring schools in SFUSD,
the sdm structure becomes the decision making entity for the school.
• If it is not against the law or rules (Ed Code, Board Policy, Union
Contract,
administrative regulations), it can be done. If it is against the
current law or rules and
it makes real educational sense to do it, a waiver can be applied for.
"Restructuring
plans as provided for in this article will operate within legal
mandates, economic
opportunities, Board of Education provisions, and requirements of the
Union contract,
unless appropriate waivers are obtained upon mutual agreement." (UESF
contract,
Article 21, Restructuring.)
• Waivers to the Ed Code, Board Policy, Union Contract and
administrative regulations
are initiated by the site through the Restructuring Council.
Restructuring plans that
require changes in laws or rules should be sent to the RSI office, and
will be
forwarded to the Restructuring Council and/or other appropriate bodies.
• Bylaws of the site sdm structure should reflect how decisions will be
made at the site
including the types of decisions, who will make what decisions (domains
of
decision-making), timelines for decisions recognizing district
timelines for mandated
decisions, etc.

Appendix D: Restructuring
21.1.2 Shared decision-making is a process whereby teachers, united
support
personnel, administrators, classified staff, parents, students, and
others, as
determined by the site, can collaborate in identifying areas in need of
improvement and in developing solutions that will enhance the learning
opportunities for all students.
21.1.3 The parties recognize that the most important interactions that
affect student
performance are those between instructional staff and students.
Instructional
staff must be able to share in decisions at the school site if they are
to share
the responsibility and accountability for the success of the school.
21.2 In order to provide the maximum opportunity for success in
District-wide
restructuring, the Union and the District have developed the following
guidelines:
21.2.1 Dissemination of information designed to develop an
understanding of
restructuring is essential.
21.2.2 Restructuring will not be imposed but allowed to evolve on a
voluntary basis.
Since site specific plans may be developed for restructuring, no single
model
can be specified.
21.2.3 Participation in the process will be open to all with
responsibility for student
outcomes, such as teachers, united support personnel, administrators,
classified staff, parents, students, and others, as determined by the
site.
21.2.4 The process of consensus decision-making or other democratic
decisionmaking
process as determined by each site will be utilized at all levels of
restructuring.
21.2.5 Restructuring plans as provided for in this article will operate
within legal
mandates, economic opportunities, Board of Education policy provisions,
and
requirements of the Union contract, unless appropriate site specific
amendments, including waivers of legal mandates, economic opportunities
and Board of Education Policy, are obtained upon mutual agreement.
21.2.6 Contract language on restructuring will enable the process to
evolve. Other
forms of agreements outside of the contract may facilitate the process
of
restructuring. One form may be a trust agreement between the District
and the Union. Another may be a multilateral agreement whereby the
District and the
Union jointly enter into a contract with other interested parties.
21.2.7 The UBC will serve as the initial conduit to the process of
restructuring. A
shared decision-making structure must be established to include
teachers,
united support personnel, the Union Building Representative,
administrators,
parents, and others, as determined by the site in fulfillment of
District, State
and Federal guidelines. The construction of this structure shall clearly
describe the scope of authority as well as a delineation of roles and
responsibilities of the constituent parties.
21.2.8 Site governance structures. See Article 25, Union Building
Committee."

17) The fact that the following response prepared by Richard Graham,
Education Programs
> Consultant, CDE. STATES:
" James, California Education Code Section 64001 requires that the SSC
develop its Single Plan for Student Achievement with the review,
certification, and advice of any applicable school advisory
committees.Various categorical programs may or may not have
requirements for advisory committees. The SSC, therefore must, at
minimum, seek the advice of those groups when they are required by
individual program statute. I was unable to find reference that would
prohibit the SSC from seeking the advice of any specific group.
However, the statute is silent on any requirement that the SSC seek the
advice of groups not required in statute, leaving it to the discretion
of the SSC."

REQUIRES THAT AS REVISED BY THE SSC SITE PLAN COMMITTEE WHICH AGREED
THAT THE LANGUAGE STATING THROUGH EACH SSC SITE PLAN GOAL APPROVED LAST
YEAR AND UNANIMOUSLY AGREED TO THIS YEAR, THE FOLLOWING LANGUAGE BE
PRESENTED TO THE SSC TO REVIEW AND REVISE IF NECESSARY TO INCLUDE THE
FOLLOWING LANGUAGE UNDER EACH SSC SITE PLAN GOAL. STRATEGIES AND
ACTIONS ACCORDINGLY……

1. The administration, UBC, and SSC will periodically review/discuss
and revise implementation and timelines.

The only intent is to protect our members from any chages which may
violate our contract or pose unfair labor practices ,which will be
averted through this language being included to underscore the UBC'S
role in protecting memebership's contractual rights.

Please for the sixth time include this on our 3/11/08 SSC AGENDA
ALONG WITH THE FOLLOWING

PRESENTATION OF PROPOSALS READ INTO MINUTES LAST THREE MONTHS REGARDING
CREATION OF
1. IN SCHOOL DETENTION CONSEQUENCE ROOM PROPOSAL
2. AFTERSCHOOL DETENTION PROPOSAL

SINCERELY,
JAMES A. GALGANO
UESF LOCAL 61 BUILDING REPRESENTATIVE
SSC ELECTED MEMBER AND SECRETARY
SSC SITE PLAN COMMITTEE PERSON
SSC BUDGET COMMITTEE PERSON

.